Archive - writing RSS Feed

20 years of Ninja Tune

This year, British indie label Ninja Tune celebrates 20 years of bestowing upon us layered beats of aural bliss.

Founded by the musical duo Coldcut in 1990, the highly-regarded label has made a significant contribution as a pioneer and major influencer of the electronic music space. Now, some 90 artists deep (including artists like Ghislain Poirier, Amon Tobin, DJ Vadim, Roots Manuva, and Mr. Scruff) the label continues to serve as inspiration to artists everywhere including those they’ve sought relentlessly to promote.

Like similar electronic labels (Warp, Ghostly, DFA) the Ninja Tune sound is distinct, it’s brand is quality, and it’s street-cred thankfully remains intact in a marketplace with increasing crossover between electronic music and pop.

To celebrate, the label has issued Ninja Tune XX Box Set (to be released 10/5) , and the book 20 Years of Beats & Pieces (10/12), telling the story of the label, their artists, and their art.

More:

http://www.ninjatunexx.com

Free Ninja Tune iPhone app by Mobile Roadie

20 Years of Beats & Pieces

Pre-order the book on Amazon

Related:
10 Years of Warp Records

That Darned Sock: Considering the Lifecycle of Clothing

Any chance you know how to darn a sock?

Me neither.

Do you know what it *means* to darn a sock?

Me neither. Well, until about ten minutes ago, when someone explained it to me for the sake of this topic.

Darning is a technique used to repair small holes in socks and other garments. Using a needle and thread, you form stitches across the gap of the hole.

We don’t need to know about darning because when a sock gets holey, we throw the pair away. Right? Just as easily, we can purchase a brand-new replacement pair. Maybe even an upgrade – a pair of socks made from a more luxurious material, perhaps boasting a more defining cut or whimsical color and/or pattern.

When clothing goes the way of unfortunate rips, holes, stains, or other malfunctions, the easiest thing to do is replace, replace, replace.

The exchange makes sense because the value of mass-manufactured clothing is considerably less than the labor cost needed for repairs.

We don’t consider breathing new life into these sad garments by mending or patching, recycling or reusing.

Old and unwearable clothing was once used for rags, bandages or even paper. Now it’s disregarded: sent to charities, sold on e-Bay, thrown away to eventually wind up in a landfill somewhere.

We’re accustomed to this convenience. We make purchases that are immediate and disposable from places that are created to serve this very purpose. We want stuff that’s of-the-moment, of style, savvily crafting a look that fits snugly within a familiar cultural device of choice.

There are so many downsides to the mass-manufacturing of clothes.  Beyond the huge issue of labor ethics, synthetic clothing is manufactured with the use of petrochemicals. Petrochemicals don’t biodegrade like natural fibers do. The garment pretty much lasts forever, and not in the good way.

Maybe it’s time to be more conscious of where our stuff comes from and who’s creating it. Awareness can yield positive results as we discover items of a higher quality, leading us to engage with nostalgic inclinations to reuse, recycle, and repeat.

I think it would be great if we could revisit the lost art of a seamstress or the work of a really amazing tailor. Clothing fits better and lasts longer, ultimately giving us a better deal in the long run.

Plus, it’s a piece of history! A well-made product that not only tells a story but will – hopefully – stand the test of time.

More:

YouTube: How to darn a sock

This post was inspired by Animal Traffic and House of Vintage in  Portland, OR. It was also inspired by @SocialMediate.

Did you like this article?  Want more?  Don’t forget to post your thoughts and feedback in the comments section!

The Age of Convenience

In any given week, many people choose to have someone else:

-wash their car
-clean their house
-feed, walk, bathe, and groom their pets
-fix the car
-landscape the yard
-drive us around. to the airport, home from the pub…
-take care of financial matters including taxes
-launder and fold our clothes
-make coffee and for that matter:
-breakfast, lunch, and dinner

(Any other big ones I’m missing?)

Obviously, these things we can do ourselves.

Someone in my office roasts his own coffee. I think there’s something great about that.

As I’m writing this, I sip from my savvily-packaged (yet weak in defense, fully-recyclable) venti Starbucks I picked up on the way in because truthfully who knows where my mug went. And, I like their Tazo tea.

This package is more than $2.39. It’s comfort, it’s identity (oh, the options to choose from! I’d like a “tall extra-hot americano, please” an actual reply from a baristo “I’ll let you know when he walks in the door!”) , and most importantly it’s ease.

In looking over the aformentioned list, I subscribe to many of these. Why? The answer to that is simple. Why not? It’s not a matter being unable to handle the day-to-day minutiae anymore. I’m buying convenience.

It makes me wonder what kind of shift is happening here on a socioeconomic level. As we place a higher value on the reliance of services, will we place a higher premium on the service-based industries? Will we start to see higher end and/or gourmet services with higher premiums?

What does this say about the way we work, and live?

Page 20 of 30« First...10«1819202122»...Last »